< back

The Red Sole Battle: Understanding the Louboutin Trademark Case

Imgur

In the world of luxury fashion, few trademarks are as instantly recognizable as Christian Louboutin's red sole on high-heeled shoes. This distinct feature has not only become synonymous with the brand's identity but has also been the subject of significant legal scrutiny. The case of Christian Louboutin vs. Van Haren Schoenen BV (Case C-163/16), adjudicated by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) on 12 June 2018, provides a fascinating insight into the complexities of trademark law, especially concerning non-traditional trademarks like colors and shapes.

Background of the Case

Christian Louboutin, a famed shoe designer, registered a trademark within the Benelux region for a specific shade of red (Pantone 18-1663TP) applied to the sole of high-heeled shoes. This registration explicitly clarified that the contour of the shoe was not part of the trademark but was meant to illustrate the positioning of the red color. However, when Van Haren Schoenen BV, a Dutch retail chain, began selling high-heeled shoes with red soles, Louboutin initiated infringement proceedings, alleging that Van Haren's actions constituted a violation of his trademark.

Legal Issue and Proceedings

The core legal issue revolved around whether Louboutin's red sole trademark fell under the concept of 'shape' as outlined in Article 3(1)(e)(iii) of Directive 2008/95/EC. This directive states that trademarks which consist exclusively of the shape of goods, which is necessary to obtain a technical result, or which gives substantial value to the goods, shall not be registered or, if registered, shall be liable to be declared invalid.

The case was brought before the Rechtbank Den Haag (District Court, The Hague, Netherlands), which then sought a preliminary ruling from the CJEU to clarify whether a color applied to a specific part of a product (in this case, a shoe sole) constitutes a 'shape' within the meaning of the directive.

CJEU's Judgment

The CJEU ruled that a sign consisting of a color applied to the sole of a high-heeled shoe does not fall within the meaning of 'shape' under Article 3(1)(e)(iii) of Directive 2008/95/EC. The Court reasoned that the concept of 'shape' typically refers to a set of lines or contours that outline the product, which does not include a color per se. Therefore, the CJEU concluded that Louboutin's red sole trademark could not be invalidated on the basis that it consisted exclusively of a 'shape'.

Implications of the Judgment

This landmark judgment has several important implications:

  • Protection of Non-traditional Trademarks: The ruling reinforces the protection available for non-traditional trademarks, such as colors, ensuring that they can serve as distinctive signs in the marketplace.

  • Clarity in Trademark Law: By clarifying the interpretation of 'shape' within EU trademark law, the judgment provides valuable guidance for businesses seeking to protect their brand identity through non-conventional means.

  • Brand Identity and Consumer Perception: The case underscores the significance of distinctive features like the red sole in creating and maintaining a luxury brand's identity and how such features influence consumer perception and decision-making.

Conclusion

The CJEU's decision in the case of Christian Louboutin vs. Van Haren Schoenen BV marks a pivotal moment in the protection of non-traditional trademarks within the European Union. It highlights the balance between fostering innovation in brand identity and ensuring the legal frameworks adapt to evolving market realities. For brands and legal practitioners alike, the Louboutin case serves as a critical reminder of the power of color in distinguishing products and the importance of robust trademark protection strategies in the competitive landscape of luxury fashion.

This case not only cements the status of Louboutin's red sole as a key element of the brand's allure but also sets a precedent for future disputes involving non-traditional trademarks, paving the way for greater creativity and distinctiveness in brand marketing and protection strategies.