< back

Qualitex Co. v. Jacobson Products Co.

Imgur

Bench/Jurisdiction:

United States Supreme Court

Key Issues:

Whether color can become trademark? It was noted that color can indeed be recognised as a trademark under the Lanham Act if it has acquired secondary meaning in the market.

Facts:

  1. Plaintiff Qualitex was selling "press pads" to drycleaning firms which were of green-gold color.
  2. Defendant Jacobson, a rival of plaintiff, started supplying "press pads" of the similar color to drycleaners pursuant to which the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit for unfair competition before the Central District of California.
  3. Thereafter, in 1991, Plaintiff filed trademark for its green-gold color with the USPTO, and added trademark infringement to the above lawsuit.
  4. The District Court ruled in favour of the plaintiff but the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit set aside the judgment stating that color alone could not be registered as a TM

Decision:

  1. A unanimous decision, written by Justice Breyer, came from SC overturning the Ninth Circuit's decision, observing that the definition of TM under the Lanham Act is very broad.

    The term “trademark” includes any word, name, symbol, or device, or any combination thereof— (1) used by a person, or (2) which a person has a bona fide intention to use in commerce and applies to register on the principal register established by this chapter, to identify and distinguish his or her goods, including a unique product, from those manufactured or sold by others and to indicate the source of the goods, even if that source is unknown.

  2. Justice Breyer noted that, while colors do not automatically evoke a connection to any product by themselves but they could acquire secondary meaning over time, by use in the market. Hence, they could assume the role of fulfilling the chief purpose of trademarks, i.e. identifying the source of a particular product.
  3. Justice Breyer also noted that functionality doctrine is no bar to the case. As per the "functionality doctrine" in trademark law asserts that a feature of a product that is essential to its use or affects its cost or quality cannot be protected as a trademark. This is because protecting functional aspects of a product would grant a monopoly on the product itself, rather than just its branding.
  4. It was noted that in this case, the purpose of color is purely asa symbol and for no other person. The argument by Jacobson that there are only a limited number of colors that can be used for the press pads in question was rejected.
  5. Justice Breyer further held that a color could be trademarked separately from any trade dress protection.

Significance:

This decision was pivotal because it extended trademark protection to include color, allowing companies to use color as a unique identifier of their brand or product, provided that the color is not functional in nature and has acquired distinctiveness. The case underscored the importance of balancing the need to protect brand identity with the need to prevent monopolies over functional aspects of products.

PS: Understanding of the US Federal Court System would help grasp the US decisions better.

U.S. Federal Court System:

District Courts:

  • These are the trial courts where cases are first heard and decided.
  • The U.S. is divided into 94 judicial districts, each having its own district court.
  • They handle both civil and criminal cases.

Circuit Courts (Courts of Appeals):

  • Above the district courts are 13 courts of appeals, also known as circuit courts.
  • They do not conduct trials but review decisions of district courts and federal administrative agencies.
  • The United States is divided into 12 regional circuits, each having a court of appeals, plus a Federal Circuit which handles specialized cases.

Supreme Court of the United States:

  • This is the highest court in the U.S.
  • It primarily reviews cases appealed from the federal circuit courts or state high courts.
  • The Supreme Court has discretionary jurisdiction, meaning it chooses which cases to hear, typically those involving significant federal or constitutional questions.

State Court System:

Each U.S. state has its own court system, which usually includes:

Trial Courts:

  • These are the first level of courts at the state level, similar to district courts at the federal level.

Intermediate Appellate Courts:

  • Not all states have these. They review decisions of trial courts within the state.

State Supreme Court:

  • This is the highest court in a state.
  • It reviews decisions of lower state courts and, in some cases, can decide federal questions.

Case Example - Qualitex Co. v. Jacobson Products Co.:

District Court (Trial Court): Qualitex initially filed its lawsuit in the Central District of California (a federal district court), where it won.

Court of Appeals: The decision was appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, which covers the western states, including California. This court reversed the district court's decision, stating that color alone could not be registered as a trademark.

Supreme Court: Qualitex then appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, which is the final arbiter and has the ultimate authority to interpret federal law, including trademark law.